|
Ancient Macedonia:
A bird’s eye view

Introduction
Macedonia
has revolved within the sphere of Greek history for more than four
millennia. Around 2300 BC groups of people who spoke a very early form of
the Greek language entered Macedonia, Epirus and the north-west corner of
Thessaly. Some groups from Epirus and Macedonia moved further south around
1900 BC and later. On the borders of these two areas the Greek tribe of
the Macedonians took shape. Part then became a founding element of the Dorians and the other part spread over southern Macedonia. From the eighth
century Chalkidiki and the coast of the rest of Macedonia saw the
establishment of colonies sent out by cities of Euboia and the Cyclades.
The Macedonians, like the peoples beyond the Pindos and on its southern
fringes, were less culturally advanced than other Greeks, especially the
Athenians. But they were never cut off from the mainstream of Greek life or
from its history. From 490 BC rulers of the Macedonians were successful in
narrowing the gap, and from time to time even played an important role in
events in the Greek world. Within a very short space of time Macedonia
became the leading Greek power; in 337 BCE its king, Philip II, was
recognized as the head of a Greek confederation. Alexander set out on his
Asian campaign to revenge the Greeks for the damage they had suffered from
the Persians. The successors of Alexander established multinational states,
through which Hellenism could be disseminated to non-Greeks.
After the death of Alexander, the old kingdom of the Macedonians was reborn
and, because of its geographical position, it had much greater contact with
the Greek states of the south. This position, together with its interests
in the direction of the Adriatic Sea, made Macedonia the first Greek state
to clash with the rising power of Rome.
From the end of the sixth century A.D. the earliest migrations of the Slavs
into the Balkan Peninsula began, affecting some parts of Macedonia.
Situation and
characteristics
Macedonia forms the connecting link between the Balkans and the Greek
peninsula. Three important routes converge on the Macedonian plain: from
the Danube via the Moravia and Axios (Vardar) valleys, from the Adriatic via
Lake Ochris, and from Thrace via Mygdonia. Contact with the south is made
by sea or by the narrow Vale of Tempe into Thessaly. On smaller scale,
looking at the landscape in detail, Macedonia does not appear to be favored.
The route along the Moravia and the Axios valleys is frequently no more than
a narrow corridor, and not a brad river valley, but a succession of basins
and gorges.
The jugged relief of the
countryside of the Moravia and the Axios valleys is typical of all
Macedonia, divided into very fragmentary relief in which certain
characteristics constantly repeat, the characteristics being the mountains
and basins. The mountains are not very high, never reaching 3000 m. though
the summits are always almost consistently above 2000 m. The basins are at
altitudes ranging from sea level to close on 1000 m. Always surrounded by
mountains, these basins have never easily served as lines of communication.
There are only two littoral plains
not so enclosed: that of Katerini, the more southerly, is also the smaller,
while the larger, that of central Macedonia, borders the western coast of
the Thermaic Gulf.
Were the
Macedonians Greeks?
There has been much discussion on the question of the nationality of the
Macedonians. Three main views have emerged: First, the Macedonians were
Greeks; second, the Macedonians were not Greeks; and third, the Macedonians
were neither Greeks nor Macedonians: they were Illyrians or Thracians.
These differences of opinion are due to the contradictory nature of evidence
handed down from antiquity. Let us examine some of the available evidence:
1)
A Persian inscription dating from 513 BC records the European peoples who
were, at that date, subject to the Great King. One of these people is
described as Yauna Takabara, meaning ‘Ionians whose head-dress is like a
shield’. The Persians, like other eastern peoples of antiquity, are known
to have applied the term ‘Ionians’ to all Greeks; on the other hand the
head-dress resembling a shield has been rightly recognized as that of
depicted on Macedonian coins.
2)
In a fragment of Hellanikos (fifth century BC), Makedon, the mythical
founder of the Macedonians, appears as the son of Aiolos. This genealogical
relationship reflects the idea the Macedonians were a section of the
Aeolians, a sub-division of the Greek race.
3)
After the battle of Issos, Alexander the Great sent a letter to Darius that
read as follows: “Your ancestors came to Macedonia and the rest of Greece
and did us much harm though we had done them no prior injury; I have been
appointed commander-in-chief of the Greeks and invaded Asia in the desire to
take vengeance on Persia for your aggressions.” From this extract it
emerges clearly that Alexander regarded Macedonia as a Greek country,
identified the sufferings of Macedonia at the hands of the Persians with the
destruction they had wrought in southern Greece, and represented himself as
the avenger of all these wrongs.
4)
The formulation ‘Macedonia and the rest of Greece’ also occurs in the treaty
of alliance between Philip V of Macedonia and Hannibal. In the same text
the phrase ‘the Macedonians and the rest of the Greeks’ occurs twice.
5)
Other passages demonstrate that non-Macedonian Greeks also thought of the
Macedonians as their kindred, and of Macedonia as a Greek country. In
217 BC Agelaos of Naupactos, speaking to a gathering at which Philip V and
representatives of his allies were present, prayed that internecine wars
between the Greeks would cease. In 211 BC, Lykiscos, representative of the
Acarnanians, described the Macedonians as kinsfolk of the Achaeans.
Macedonia is accounted part of Greece by various authors.
6)
The general sense of a passage in Thucydides gives the impression that the
historian considered the Macedonians barbarians. Various ancient
geographers and historians of the classical and post-classical periods, such
as Ephoros, Pseudo-Scylax, Dionysios son of Calliphon and Dionysius
Periegetes, put the northern borders of Greece at the line from Ambracian
Gulf to the Peneios. Isocrates places Macedonia outside the boundaries of
Greece and describes the Macedonians as
ούχ
ομόφυλον
γένος
(‘an unrelated race’). Medeios of Larisa, who accompanied Alexander on his
campaign in Asia, calls the Thessalians ‘the most northerly of the Greeks’.
7)
When Alexander I, king of the Macedonians, wanted to compete at Olympia
(possibly in 496 BC), his prospective opponents attempted to exclude him by
arguing that only Greeks, and not barbarians, could take part in the Olympic
Games. Alexander proved that he was a Greek and was therefore allowed to
compete.
An evaluation of the evidence suggests the following:
1) One
ancient tradition connects the Macedonians with the Dorians and another
traces the family to Argos in the Peloponnese. From this it can be deduced
that the Macedonians, like the Dorians, were Greeks.
2)
In official documents of Alexander the Great and Philip V, Macedonia is
described as a Greek country; in the first of them, Alexander represents
himself as the avenger of the evils wrought by the Persians both in
Macedonia and in the rest of Greece; and an ambassador of Philip V
classifies the Macedonians with the Greeks in contradistinction with
‘foreigners’ (αλλοεθνείς)
and ‘barbarians’ (βάρβαροι). The Macedonian kings, although they
believed that they had a different ancestry from their subjects, did not
consider themselves to be ruling outside Greece, or over a people foreign to
the Greeks.
3)
In conclusion, the
hypothesis that the Macedonians were Greeks is supported by all the reliable
evidence: the ancient tradition that the Dorians were descended from a
section of the Macedonians; the view the Macedonian kings held about
themselves; and the testimony of Hellanicos, who lived at the Macedonian
court. All the testimony that contradict this view are external and derive
either from observers who might have been mistaken, or from enemies of the
Macedonians.

The chryselephantine
shield from “Philip’s Tomb”. The outer side is dominated by the rich
decoration of gold and ivory. In the centre a young woman kneels,
exhausted (possibly an Amazon) and a young man holds out his hand to her
(possibly Achilles). The young woman’s feet which are well preserved are
perfectly shaped. The circular decoration of the outer edge is made up
of two bands of spirals separated by another broad band with meanders.
The inside of the shield was distinguished for the glitter of the gold
sheets; four of these, which formed a cross which ended in a palmette,
were embellished with relief winged victories. Relief lions decorated
the two trapezoidal sheets at the centre.
Religion
From the data at our disposal at present, we know that the Macedonians
worshipped the twelve Olympian gods, both collectively and individually, and
also Pluto, Persephone, Dionysos, Pan, Hestia, Heracles, Asklepios, Okeanos,
Amphitrite, the Nereids, Thetys, Orpheus, the Diocouroi, Amphilochos, the
Nymphs, the Graces, the Fates, Hygieia, Lethe, Nemesis and Eros. They also
gave them the familiar Greek epithets, such as Agoraios, Basileus, Olympios,
Hypsistos of Zeus, Basileia of Hera, Soter of Apollo, Hagemona and Soteira
of Artemis, Boulaia of Hestia, etc.
Some to the evidence for the worship of Ge, Helios, Dionysos, Pan, Asklepios
and Heracles is earlier than the period of Philip, while the earliest
evidence for the twelve gods from this period. The large number of these
god’s names and the early date of the evidence militates against the false
argument advanced by those opposed to the idea that the Macedonians were
Greeks.
The Macedonians were particularly devoted to Zeus, father of Makedon (Μακεδών),
their eponymous ancestor, and to Heracles, held to be the progenitor
(Ηρακλής
προπάτωρ)
of the Argead clan as well as of the later Antigonid dynasty. Notable are
the cults of Zeus Hetairides (Εταιρίδης),
who presided over the relationship of the Argead kings with their
aristocratic Companions
(εταίροι)
and who gave his name to the festival of the Hetairideia. Heracles
Kynagidas (Κυναγίδας)
was worshipped as the patron of hunting, a sport to which the Macedonians
were passionately attached. Heracles Kynagidas was also presiding over the
Royal Huntsmen
(βασιλικοί
κυνηγοί)
as well as over the kings’ game preserves.
Established custom required the king personally to conduct many rites and
sacrifices. Among these two of the most important were: (a) the formal
purification of the army performed each at the festival of the Xandica
(Ξανδικά)
held in the early spring, at the beginning of the campaigning season,
though this purification could be performed at other times as well; and (b)
the overseeing of the ceremonial interment of the Macedonian dead
post-combat.
Cult figures, largely Thracian and indigenous to the regions occupied by the
Argead Macedonians, continued to be worshipped along side the Macedonian
religion. We have, for instance, the water-air spirit that gave its name to
Edessa, an old town famous for its springs and situated near Aigai, the
earliest residence of the Macedonian kings. Meanwhile, the reverence
accorded to Sileni (σαυάδαι)
and Bacchae (Κλώδωνες
and
Μιμαλλόνες)
indicates a prevalence of Dionysus-Sabazius worship.
In addition the names of the twelve Macedonian synodic lunar months depict
Greek names used in various parts of Greece:
Dios
(moon of October)
Apellaios
(moon of November)
Audnaios
(moon of December)
Peritios
(moon of January)
Dystros
(moon of February)
Xandikos
or Xanthikos (moon of March)
Artemisios
or Artamitios (moon of April), also a Spartan, Rodian and Epidaurian
month)
Daisios
(moon of May)
Panēmos
or Panamos (moon of June), also an Epidaurian, Miletian, Samian and
Corinthian month
Loios
(moon of July), also an Aetolian, Beotian and Thessalian month
Gorpiaios
(moon of August)
Hyperberetaios
(moon of September), Hyperberetos was a Cretan month.
The Hellenistic and Roman imperial periods show few developments peculiar to
Macedonia. By the end of the third century BC the Egyptian gods had been
widely received, and the cult of the Syrian Goddess was established at
Beroia. Documented evidence does not as yet attest to the worship of Zeus
Hypsistos
(‘Ύψιστος)
before the second century, but the cult may well have arisen earlier. In
the Roman period and above all at Thessaloniki, the cult of
Dioscuroi-Cabiroi, which derives from Samothrace, was most successful. In
addition, the cult of Ma of Cappadocia was known to be found at Edessa in
the third century AD; and from the late Hellenistic period down to the
triumph of Christianity the Thracian Rider
(‘Ήρως
or
Ήρων)
was the object of widespread devotion, particularly in connexion with the
burial of the dead.
By way of conclusion, elements that are unquestionably Greek are much more
numerous than those which are not Greek. The great majority of the Greek
elements is earlier in date than the non-Greek. These observations show
that the Macedonians were not Thracians or Illyrians or any other race that
became Hellenised, but Greeks whose culture was slightly influenced by
non-Greek features.
Intellectual
life
The Macedonian kings attracted leading writers to their court. In the first
decade of the fifth century BC, Pindar composed an ode in honour of
Alexander I, who competed at Olympia. There is no doubt that Pindar’s ode
was performed with music and dance at the Macedonian court and that Pindar
himself was present as the guest of the king. The relations of
guest-friendship between Pindar and Alexander I led Alexander the Great to
make an exception of the house and the descendants of Pindar during the
destruction of Thebes in 335 BC.
Alexander’s successor, Perdikkas II, entertained at his court Melanippides,
a dithyrambic poet, and Hippocrates of Kos, the originator of scientific
medicine. Archelaos, famous in Greece for his victories in the chariot-race
at the Pythian Games and the Olympic Games, secured the services of the
outstanding painter Zeuxis, the leading musician Timotheos, and the fine
epic poet Choirilos. It is apparent that the royal court (the term
comprises not only the royal family but also the families of the king’s
Companions – the
εταίροι)
was imbued with Greek ideas and showed a lively interest in literature and
the arts. Consequently it is not surprising that two of the most
distinguished Attic tragedians lived and worked in Macedonia over a period
of years: Agathon (c. 407-01 BC) and Euripides (408-06 BC), because they
found there not only a more acceptable centre than wartime Athens but also,
although archaeological evidence is lacking, some tradition of theatrical
performance. During his stay in Macedonia Euripides became a Companion of
the king and composed two tragedies, Archelaos, in the course of
which he endowed the royal line with a new ancestor, the mythical Archelaos,
and Bacchae, a play which was inspired by his own experience of
Dionysian worship as he found it in Macedonia.
We do not know whether Macedonia had developed any native forms of
literature in an oral rather than written form, but there were certainly
native traditions of music and local forms of dance. The earliest Orphic
hymn was found during the excavation of a tomb of the fourth century BC at
Derveni in central Macedonia. When Philip II rose to power, he attracted a
large number of southern Greeks into his service. At this time Philip and
his court were fully integrated into the main body of Greek cultural
development. It was characteristic of the respect in which Philip held the
Greek spirit that he entrusted the education of his own heir and of the
circle which was to provide the leaders of the future to Aristotle.
Native literature developed with Antipater’s History of the Wars of
Perdikkas with the Illyrians, while two young contemporaries of
Alexander called Marsyas and Ptolemy were acquiring the education which
enabled them later to write works of exceptional value on the history of
Macedonia and the achievements of Alexander.

One of the grave stellae
from the Great Tumulus with the names of the dead:
Ξενοκρατης
Πιεριωνος
(Xenokratis Pierionos)
Δρυκαλος
Πιεριωνος
(Drykalos
Pierionos), they must have been brothers. The names Drykalos and Pierion
are typical Macedonian names (M. Andronikos, Vergina – The Royal
Tombs, p.84-85).

The most beautiful of the painted stellar found in the Great Tumulus. On
the left is an armed man standing; on the right a man seated on a backed
chair. In the background, between the two, was a standing female figure;
below, to the right, a young child. The inscription gives four names and
the patronyms (Κλεωνυμος
Ακυλου
–
Αδυμος Χλεωνυμου
–
Πευκολαος Αδυμου
- _ρινω
Αδυμου),
(M. Andronikos, Vergina – The Royal Tombs)
Sources:
Hammond N.G.L. (edd.), The
Oxford Classical Dictionary (2nd ed., Oxford University
Press, 1970)
Sakellariou M.B. (ed.), Macedonia. 4000
Years of Greek History and Civilization (Ekdotike Athenon, Athens, 1983)
Andronicos Manolis, Vergina – The Royal
Tombs (Ekdotike Athenon, Athens, 1989)
by
Dr Kostas Vitkos
and Mr Iakovos Garivaldis
(Published first in “Athena”
journal, iss.14, Melbourne 2006, of the Society for Ancient Hellenic
Studies, www.sahs.com.au)
*Sources
of the development of the Pan-Macedonian Association in USA were taken from
Lazarus Papapaionnou's book,
The Pan-Macedonian Association
of America, Sixty Years of Activity.
www.Macedonia.info
BACK TO INDEX
|